West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 The testimony of the evidence was not brought to the file despite a long-distance scrutiny to show that the prosecution's witnesses (policemen) were not truthful or that the case was filed because of malware. The investigating officer was not asked why, in cross-examination, why the public was not made to witness the recovery memo, the evidence of the prosecution was not upset and the accused was convicted and sentenced under similar circumstances. Was retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
