MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus UNION COUNCIL, BAJNIAL
The Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Sections 166 139, 156 and 173 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3), the High Court, denied the constitutional petition on the ground that the law governing this case was a suitable alternative. Was provided and the work was not finished, the constitutional petition would not be permissible. The lie is that which could be more properly and easily debated by the High Court and this would not have been done by the persons mentioned in the provisions of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979. There may be debate and provocation in the front. This issue can be taken advantage of, especially in cases involving contentious questions, and such disputes can be better provoked by a forum that can easily record evidence. No justification for interference was granted as the High Court decision was unnecessary, permitting the appeal was denied in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kohlu lawyer