Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

CPC Summary Procedure of the CPC Summary Procedure of Segusable Devices OXXXVII, Secs 6, 35, and the Schedule of Stamp Act, 1899, was a suit for collection of funds on the basis of the promissory note. The defendants resisted, claiming that the promotional note on which the case was filed was inadmissible in evidence as it was inadequately sealed and at the same time acknowledged receipt on a printed form. Implemented, the receipt was hanged on the left side of the form with the required stamp. Due to such stamping, the instrument was written unanimously on the back of the claimant and the rest of the stamps were also affixed to the back of the device, but the document claims to have been filed. Was not suitable and was properly sealed. As the invoice is a single transaction that falls into two specifications in the Schedule to the Stamp Act, 1899, which deals with separate duty and is sealed at different places, though appropriate. how to become a advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer