MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MAKHAN
The pre-emption Act of 1913, section 154 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 454 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 was present on the record of the trial of the accused by the plaintiff, which shows That the trial is on record. The sale agreement on which the claimant was claiming to be a partner does not belong to, nor does he have any concern with, Khodata in the question. Better yet, such a sale will result in a plaintiff as the owner of the estate who will not help her because she did not search for it. The right to vacate as a plaintiff was also owned by the property as stated by the claimant, therefore, could not be successful on that basis, hence the reason for which the leave was granted. The plaintiff will be of no benefit and the appeal will fail on this ground.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Sakrand lawyer
