Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE

The Government Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, restored the allotment of land allotted under the Colonel, Guru Mear Food Scheme of section 10, resulting in the separation of five persons within five miles of the prohibited area. The land allotted to the place was also resumed. The same ground on which the land was resumed should be replaced by alternate land as per the directions issued by the allotment authority as the land allotted by the allottee. Located in Chuck, the other Allies were allotted. Without hearing the controversial allotment and considering his ability to be equal to the alternative land, the alternative land also applied for an allotment case for the other allottee, who was also eligible for the alternative land, could not be taken in isolation. It could have been decided and in the absence of the allottee, Eliot's hearing has been condemned, and his case was disputed by the controversial authority for not deciding on alternative land in light of the policy and guidelines. The ability to obtain land, the law issued by it, the correct position of law and the facts Suffered serious misunderstanding, and could no longer maintain such order. The case was remanded illegally by authorities and remanded to determine the applicant's and other allotment eligibility questions, on the alternative land and to what extent they were entitled. law firms from Killa Abdullah lawyer