Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PHOOL CHAND BAJRANG LAL versus INCOME TAX OFFICER


Failure to disclose the material facts of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, in whole and in part the restoration of section 147 (a), the cash loan is claimed by the company which is accepted as original and original estimates. In which interest was deducted. The Company whose Managing Director acknowledged that the Company had not raised any loan for anyone while covering the history of the Cash Loan then accurate, specific and reliable notice of the information is only valid for review. No Change of opinion The reasons for assuring that the ITO believes that income shortages were avoided is not for the Court to decide on sections 147 (a), 148 and 149 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Quetta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.