Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus STATE


Sections 302/149/148 and 309/310 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the trial court had disclosed the facts of the case on the basis of a compromise between the parents of the victim. That the deceased was also a minor sister and brother, and the unnecessary High Court of the accused was acquitted, therefore, by an invalid order, the accused was allowed a week's time to pay himself Rs. Consider and advise. The fact that the complainant (the deceased's father) was a minor's sister and brothers was not contradicted before the Supreme Court, but was admitted in the petition itself, otherwise the High Court. The order was mutually relevant and the leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Vehari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.