Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BOOTS COMPANY PAKISTAN LIMITED versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE


Drug Act 1940 Section 3 Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Schedule Central Excise Rules, 1944, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Street Systems which was developed by applicants was a drug and a drug. Due to this it was exempted from sales tax strapless liabilities. In fact, the Drugs Act, 1976 was a pharmaceutical preparation, and because of this, it could not be called sugar sweetener and thus could not be obtained for sales tax purposes. That the strips were lanzins. Used as a cure for mouth and throat infections, and a valuable commitment to treat other deep throat infections, sales tax on such products would not be justified. Without any legal influence, without any legal effect and they were dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Jamshoro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.