Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BOOTS COMPANY PAKISTAN LIMITED versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE


Drug Act 1940 Section 3 Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Schedule Central Excise Rules, 1944, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Street Systems which was developed by applicants was a drug and a drug. Due to this it was exempted from sales tax strapless liabilities. In fact, the Drugs Act, 1976 was a pharmaceutical preparation, and because of this, it could not be called sugar sweetener and thus could not be obtained for sales tax purposes. That the strips were lanzins. Used as a cure for mouth and throat infections, and a valuable commitment to treat other deep throat infections, sales tax on such products would not be justified. Without any legal influence, without any legal effect and they were dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.