RIAZ AHMAD versus STATE
Section 302/34 Investigating the evidence There were material contradictions in the receipt of a police incident report and evidence of the prosecution regarding the manner in which the two survivors were injured. Eyewitnesses improved the trial. At this point, it was suspected that the complainant had changed his initial statement and made additional statements and contradicted it by rejecting the above statement before the trial court prosecution, thus, without reasonable doubt. Failed to prove his case against the accused, the accused was acquitted on benefits. Doubt in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Lakki Marwat lawyer
