Find a Lawyer

ZAFRAN versus BAIDULLAH JAN

Section 13 Students, performance of words use sha evening prayer The defendant in the debate argued that m after the evening prayer int did not have the time required to be mentioned in the plaintiff's definition of time so narrow. It wasn't just that it could be determined. In minutes and seconds words could calculate / determine specific time after evening prayer sha After evening prayer law lived within the desired time frame according to law Pre-emptor excluded revision of keywords according to law Was \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• Dr. MOMIN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 211
• ASLAM KHAN v. KHUSHDIL KHAN 2015 MLD 213
• Engineer MUSHARAF SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 PLC(CS) 215
• WAQAR AHMAD v. State 2015 PLD 218
• IJAZ v. Mst. MANADIA 2015 PLD 223
• MUHAMMAD HASHIM v. SONA KHAN 2015 CLC 223
• GUL MAST v. KHASITA GUL 2015 MLD 226
• NORTHERN BOTTLING (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2015 PTD 231

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

ask a advocate free from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes