Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAUF versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) Appeal for leave to appeal The conclusions reached by the trial court and the first appellate court, concluding that the concurrent findings of the two courts below the intervention by the High Court guidelines were reasonable and reasonable and He cannot even be arrested on this evidence. Such a result was misunderstood or misinterpreted so that the result can be reasonably and appropriately drawn by the definition and by the courts properly the High Court has drawn the facts under which the finding of facts by the courts I was not intercepted, which was fully supported by the evidence on record. Reality cannot be bothered by mere misinterpretation of definitions or misinterpretation of evidence, but can only be challenged if it is not based on doctrinal theories that do not support the facts on record. Was made and is the result of speculation and speculation if the law does not contain errors or omissions. Procedure was established to ascertain the fact, the High Court was bound to search where there was evidence to maintain the record, even if the High Court had come to the conclusion that such evidence If a different finding can be made on the basis of this, it will not happen, the basis for the intervention should be left to appeal, the circumstances denied. top advocates from Sita Road lawyer