ABDUL KHALIQ versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA)
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) A government employee defending such misconduct for a three-year period related to corruption on charges of unauthorized power connection to a village has defended such misconduct Had done so under the verbal injunction. The superior officer was not supported on the record and the officer was denied. The question involved in the appeal for leave in the application of the relevant question was one of fact, which was not established on the record by a civil servant dispute. He did not, however, raise any specific questions about the law. The leave to appeal the public importance was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mamu kunjan lawyer
