Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASUL versus SHER MUHAMMAD

Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R11 & O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 of CPC Plants O VII, R1 & 2 of the Sale of Land by the Tenant of the State Land Colonial Law (Punjab) Act (V12 of 1912), Section 19 The plaintiff's dismissal of the plaintiff's filing suit claimed for the specific performance of the land sale agreement in the dispute and in the permanent injunction that the plaintiff, who was the tenant of the state land, received the money after the sale of the land to them. And promised to sell them fully on the ownership of the property. In the allotted land the plaintiff alleged that the defendants, who were refusing to sell the whole, had threatened to expel them from the land in dispute, denying the claim of the plaintiff in order VII, R 11, c. On filing an application under the PC, the plaintiff filed a petition for rejection. Not applicable which application was simultaneously accepted by the lower courts and rejected because the competing competitor was not a competent court because only the sale of all the state is not entitled to public land rights. Were the assignment of property to the allottee / tenant, if any, the specific performance of the alleged contract of sale would not be restricted, the proof of the alleged sale contract, subject to the evidence, was terminated. Upon the transfer of the property rights in the land, the alleged sale did not lie for a specific performance because no property rights in the land had been granted to the tenant allotted in the estate or its allotment. , Without any foreign land occupying government land inheritance advocates near Battagram lawyer