Find a Lawyer

ATTIYA-TUL-QADDUS versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Convener Shahadat (10 of 1984), the respondent who had earlier succeeded on the basis of a certificate specific to one of the internal seats as a State subject in Jammu and Kashmir as a Domicile Certificate in Article 114 Medical College from Sindh Province. The domicile was issued. On the basis of their own request for admission to any of the medical colleges of Sindh, the respondents failed to get admission in any of the medical colleges of Sindh due to their failure to obtain the Domicile Certificate from Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Forced to protect it. Was able to gain admission to a particular seat. The respondent, who is a permanent resident of Sindh and was born there, was bound to his own admission and was claimed in front of the District Magistrate in a district of Sindh on which he denied his previous position. Had stopped. On the basis of which he was issued the Domicile Certificate of the Province of Sindh in 1992 and then the Permanent Resident Certificate Party / Pei Na Rasin may be allowed to withdraw from his previous claim on convenience and choice, especially when Courses were not permitted in law as if a competing right of a rival party had to retreat. In particular, when a party's previous claim relied on the facts and position of the case, the Sindh District Magistrate's application and the issuance of the former Domicile Certificate, proceeded against the defendant's stated facts. Will go A person has only one resident, then, on the basis of wrongdoing from Azad Jammu and Kashmir, suppress the material facts. property advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer