Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ AHMAD BHATTI versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 203G Constitutional Jurisdiction Applicants were borrowed from the Respondent Corporation for construction of the house and an agreement was executed by agreeing to the terms and conditions mentioned in it. In the constitutional application, the petitioner challenged the notice of demand issued by the respondent corporation to him. Therefore, the acquisition of the loan amount, which demanded the interest amount to be profitable for the effects of Islam, was in violation of Article 2A of the Constitution, which resulted in the agreement which came out of an agreement. The middle has reached its own. In exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court could not enter into such disputes. The court also had no jurisdiction to determine the veracity of interest in view of Article 203 6 of the Constitution. jobs for fresh advocates from Mangal Sada lawyer