Find a Lawyer

DITTA KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN

The proper review of the parties of the Pre-Impression Suit Trial Court, Section 115 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1919, found that the plaintiffs / respondents were pre-empted with the right of prejudice but He dismissed the case after detecting it. In the absence of a decision of the Court of Appeal, the decision on the issue of eligibility for appeal is overturned by the Court of Appeal for the purpose of fee and jurisdiction for the purpose of the Court of Appeal. The plaintiff / respondents' claim was not challenged by the rival pre-emptor in any other case, however, the review was taken by the petitioner (vendor) to the High Court, where the High Court observed that the appellant. The appellate court's finding on the question of the court had jurisdiction to evaluate and to appeal its appeal, although it was still debatable to avoid the remand of the case, and it retained the full re-evaluation and coherence of the evidence. The finding of the courts underneath it was found to be premature right and such is the case and there is no basis to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court which did not face any weakness, the Supreme Court said. Refused to interfere. tax advocates from Ukba lawyer