Sections 129 and 130 (1) (2) were required by the Ombudsman to refuse payment on a claim filed under the Insurance Policy Complaint Appeal, which was involved in the case, even if the insurer's vision was deficient. It was allegedly caused by his fall crossing the stairs, or it was the end result of an illness, before the insurance company entered into an insurance contract with the appellant, and through medical tests, the fact from fiction Was keen to know and had already tried and exhausted without drawing any conclusions. It was understood, in the circumstances, that it would be better if the two parties offered a plea bargain on behalf of the appellant, if the insurance company would treat the appellant's blind disease, then the company There was no further justification for the appellant's second offer was to return the entire premium already paid to the insurance company, and to continue with the basic life policy. Other items were discussed that would be relevant in the coming period. I had a premium waiver, and a policy to continue and to pay the appellant compensation under this decision The gig should be done in the fairway, whose basic life is life. The lawyer of the insurance company has submitted that the company is willing to return the entire premium of Rs 50,000 without any deduction from the appellant. Accepting the final settlement offer with Proviso, that it will not be deducted from the premium refund insurance company in advance, the approving parties voluntarily reached an agreement, it was ordered that the insurance company had already Paid
Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2013
