Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MALIK versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Purchase Act 1993 Section 18 was ordered by the seller or seller to defeat the rulers who issued notices to those with pre-purchase rights, proving that the pre-importer It was informed of the transaction under which the property, in order to sell the essential elements of such information, had to be separated (in question) to identify the property. (B) Informative (c) Proposed Price. And (d) when such a suggestion or proposal is made, according to the spirit of the law it is necessary to state the time, to establish that the information was given very close to the transaction period and not In the remote period. Enough to fulfill the condition of the notice provided under section 18, the identity of the property under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Prevention Act for sale and its proposed value was also required as to the person to whom the offer was made. Was to be deprived of it. Legal right of advance purchase No person shall, through deception, fraud and fraudulent evidence, lose the legal right to purchase in advance, in accordance with the terms of Section 18, Azad Jammu and the pre-authorization To defend. Kashmir Rights of the Pressure Purchase Act, it was not necessary that the seller had to prove it by giving written notice and that the offer of amnesty was justified by oral evidence as well. patent advocate from Murree lawyer