Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD FEROZE versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB


Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 (1), Section 4 (1) Approval of cancellation of public servants, reversal of retention of constitutional application Can only be challenged before a service tribunal. After the exhaustion of the departmental treatment, the plea of the government employees to set the reverse order was not covered by the misconduct of Proviso (B) under section 4 (1), Punjab Service Tribunals. In 1974, the High Court jurisdiction was barred in such a case. Article 212 of the Constitution under the Order of Replacing a Government Employee was not in any way related to fitness questions The public servant could not add fitness scope for development to the service tribunal's jurisdiction. , Couldn't be like that. Allow non-controversial applications (such as re-alteration and fitness) to be approved and reproduced so as to attract the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Sudhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.