Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

TARLOKI NATH AVINASH CHANDER (HUF) versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


The Commissioner's delay in filing returns on the disclosed income as per the direction of the ITO of the Department for receiving interest and initiating penalties under Section 271 under Section 139 (8), Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Interest deductions were extended to the department and tax. (1) (i) The Commissioner of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the request for interest and penalty waiver only because the applicant was a habitual defaulter commissioner only to see whether the returns were voluntarily filed. There is no proper exercise in what is or is being intentionally revealed. The discretion of the Commissioner Matter obtained the remand of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 273A.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Dadakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.