AFTAB AHMAD SHAHIN versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB
Article 15 (3) Calendar of the University of Punjab for the year 1977, Para 5 (a) of the Vice-Chancellor of the University is capable of setting up committees to hear and dismiss pending appeals. Existence, the Vice-Chancellor was able to appoint committees to hear and dispose of interstate appeals relating to interstate employees, and was senior to the respondent applicants as a junior clerk and in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 (b). They were rightly assigned to such an elder. In the year 1977, the petitioners of the Punjab University Enforcement could not be allowed to raise the question for the first time in the constitutional petition as there was no aggravation on such a case. I would not be interested. Intervention does not guarantee the validity assigned to employees by the Authority
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
