Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABID MASOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB


Article 2 (1) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 199 and 212 Jurisdiction of High Court in matters relating to the conditions and service of civil servants Constitutional bar Regular regulation of public servants in this case excludes the jurisdiction of the High Court. Done. The provisions of Article 212 of the Customs Act are that the appointment of a public servant on ad hoc basis will hardly improve, for, by definition of a public servant, any person holding a post in relation to the affairs of the province. Employees who were employed in this position are not excluded from the definition of 'Government Employee of', they will be treated as Government Employees by the meaning of the Government Employees of Punjab, Act, 1974 The dispute is whether the terms of service of public servants. Was required to regulate the rules and regulations. Their service and jurisdiction of such High Court was not enforceable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Battagram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.