Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING STAFF AND WORKERS\' UNION, MULTAN DIVISION versus DIRECTOR AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, MULTAN DVISION

Employers objected to the registration of trade unions in the establishment of the Trade Relations Ordinance 1969, Articles 3 and 8 of the Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964, R28 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 17 of the Trade Union. Under the Government Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1964, public servants of a particular category could form associations, but they would remain exclusively members of the same association charge against certain members of the trade union registered by employers. It was decided that he was a dual member of All Pakistan. The Clerks' Association and the applicant's union as well, but the employers could not prove this charge under Article 3 of the Ordinance, granting workers the freedom to form a trade union or join their association of choice, without any prior authorization. Establishment staff that comes in appreciation. Workers and workers were free under the Constitution of Pakistan and under the relevant law Regarding the Public Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964 KR 28, the law required the trade union to join the trade union of its choice. It was not open to employers to defeat the intention of the maker, who had finalized the registration of the applicant's union as a trade union. The resumption of the rule, which was set forth five years before the ordinance, was inappropriate, inappropriate, and irrelevant to the employees' reference to the Official Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964 KR28. Was against the will of And to that extent should be considered humiliating, obsolete and useless famous high court advocate from Lasbela lawyer