Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJID versus NADIR ALI

CPC Adjustments OXVII, R3 and Civil Procedure Code Order XVII of Section 115, did not present the jurisdictional evidence of the plaintiff to the plaintiff of the evidence, nevertheless, the plaintiff was given a last chance at the request for proof, but he submitted. The plaintiff's evidence was closed and the defendant dismissed the case without considering the admission made in his written statement, according to which the defendant's obligation to pay some amount was paid by the defendant. Was accepted The court order to dismiss the case was upheld by Appellate Court They were rightly closed, but despite such disclosures, the court had to decide on a case-by-case basis, in the case of the plaintiff the minimum amount of liability should have been decided. Which the defendant acknowledges in his written statement rejecting the trial case under both the courts, complete the notice / petitioner irrespective of admission: o The defendant / defendant has his own obligation to pay a certain amount. In respect of the jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction was exercised illegally, which is to the extent of the defendant / defendant's entry without interfering with the amending jurisdiction's decision. Following orders along with the courts in which the evidence of the plaintiff was sealed top advocate from Nowshera lawyer