GULAS KHAN versus CALTEX OIL (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 25 served with a notice of complaint against the dismissal of the timely service of the employees in filing a complaint for dismissal, but instead of filing a complaint petition before the Labor Court, the decision was presented. The sighting magistrates court resolved their complaint. A complaint was lodged under Section 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act 1952 under the Supreme Court PLD 1982 SC 125, which was the appropriate forum at that time, the employee had resolved the issue on criminal matters for 4 years, But later when he found out that despite the recent Supreme Court ruling, his treatment is now with the Labor Court, he filed a complaint before the Labor Court without wasting any time, though the complaint was filed. There was a significant delay of 4 years, but during those 4 years the employee showed diligence. And the rigor in the matter of filing a complaint before the magistrate, which in the relevant time as the correct forum, and later when the employees learned that the decision of the Supreme Court situation later when the forum for redressing their grievances. If the decision has been changed, he has filed a complaint without any loss of time. Under the circumstances, the issue of employees was appropriate for prosecution. Delay
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
