The Supreme Court order XVI and XVI, R 6, revocation of the revision petition was dismissed for the non-prosecution advocate's record although the request for postponement requested the adjournment of the case without waiting for the pending orders, on the date of the hearing itself. The absent record was not a misconception that when the parties' suggestions were agreed to be postponed, the matter was automatically adjourned, unless the court accepts such request and the demand for the adjournment is granted, fixed by the parties. History was bound to appear in court. The motion was not accepted, the parties were refused to appear in court on the due date when no one was present on the petitioner's behalf while the lawyer for the defendant was present, the case dismissed for illegal prosecution. Was done, there was no proper basis for the review application to be reinstated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
