Find a Lawyer

ARDAR SHAH versus RASUL BIBI

Conan e-Evidence Order 1984 Article 76 Secondary Proof Preparation of Applicants Claiming to Own the Land in Dispute Based on Two Unregistered Sale Works, as Proof of Claim of Your Claim, of Secondary Proof of Document Sold Permission to submit photocopies was requested. This original was presented incorrectly = The court tried to present the photocopies as secondary evidence by changing the copies, finding that none of them were related to the original one. The court also saw clear contradictions in these documents regarding the amount of dispute and consideration in these documents. For such reasons the applicant's request to present the secondary evidence was dismissed, no doubt, the plaintiff applicant had the right to prove his case through the necessary evidence, but the defendant also had a non-judgmental or unexpected situation. Could not be allowed to face a fact where allegations of fact were made and some material in support of it was relied upon, if the evidence had to be confined to any deviation from this principle. , The contesting party may, with its justification, take exception to this and restrict the evidence to the extent specified. R may, from the date of import documents, the date of implementation of documents and discrepancies in the documentation relating to this limit. The considerations for the decision of the applicant were relevant, in addition, the documents for which registration is unregistered and only Rs. 729, also determine their acceptance before the secondary proof of their contents is allowed. Because in any case Pakistan, top advocate family court from Lahore lawyer