Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

Section 24 and 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 of the Pharmacy Act 1967 Applicants were not allowed to enroll for the examinations of pharmacy assistants as they were not registered as apprentices in the pharmacy which is allegedly present in the above examination. Was an example. Until 1981, thanksgiving apprenticeships were closed and it was never reopened. The respondents' request was that the applicants did not have the qualifications mentioned in Section 30 (c) Pharmacy Act 1967, i.e. the applicant for admission to the examination as an apprentice for a period of at least two years prior to the pharmacy examination. The first proviso contained in section 30 (c), however, in the express term, states that clause (c) of section 30 shall not apply during the period in which section 24 (1), the Pharmacy Act, Apprenticeships in pharmacy were closed under the 1967 provisions. d Subsequent to the provision of section 30 (c) for a period of two years, the applicant was not compelled to apply, which was in the nature of the exemption of the basic supply implemented in the Central Clause Petitioners. ? The refusal to enter the examinations could not be denied because they were not registered as the applicants were eligible to enroll in the application but even though they were not registered as apprentices in the pharmacy petitioners already order According to the Court of Appeal, the respondents were instructed to declare their result immediately. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Shedani sharif lawyer