Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus HABIB JUTE MILLS LIMITED, KHUSHAB

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) (k) employees were dismissed on charges that they, along with other trade union officials, were agitated in front of workers. Have fun. The entry gate provoked them that unless the demand for commodity supply at discounted prices was accepted at the fair price shop, they not only prevented employees and other officials from entering the mills but forced them out. Even those who went in. Not only did the employee receive a charge sheet or inquiry notice for his work, he was repeatedly offered, but did not participate in the inquiry process despite all efforts under the Employees Act. Under which the process of mismanagement was fully established. The independent evidence court also examined the evidence in detail and concluded that the allegation of misconduct was made equal to one of the largest employer proved against it, the employee was unable to identify any such fact. Who could reproduce the authenticity of the court-generated findings, the order dismissing the employee from the job was unimaginable famous supreme court advocate from Islamabad lawyer