Find a Lawyer

SHAMAS TEXTILE MILLS versus EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION

Employers challenged the demand notice issued by the institution to maintain the constitutional request to confirm the demand for an additional amount of contributions to the Employees Old Age Benefit Act 1976 section 34, 34 and 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Requires the employer to pay additional money to the account. The employer of the partnership challenged the constitutional application as well as the issuance of such demand notice through a complaint under section 33; clear machinery was clearly provided for in the act, so that the company Correctly correct incorrect and illegal orders passed by. Not only in the complaint but he simultaneously filed a constitutional petition against his complaint, which has been told by law that it can be easily resolved by filing a complaint. Controversial questions raised by the employer cannot go to the High Court in the constitutional petition. 33 And this is also the complaint filed under this section, the constitutional application filed by the employer company was disqualified. family advocate from Kasur lawyer