Find a Lawyer

INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus MRS NAZNEEN HUSSAIN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A (8) (9) and 38 (3A) of a Labor Court employee's non-compliance order, which was dismissed for unauthorized absence. He was restored to the job and returned by the Labor Court. This restraining order was upheld even by the High Court, which refused to interfere with the judgments of the courts under the goodwill, dealing with the observation of the constitutional petition filed by the employers, if the employers. If advised, they will be free to move forward in this matter. The matter was strictly in accordance with the law, following the High Court decision, the courts decided to hold a new inquiry against the employee in view of the decision in his favor, but the employee's request was not accepted because the High Court thereafter Employers were allowed to move forward in the matter, after the inquiry into the payment of return benefits will be decided. Employees' application was filed by employees against Section 25A (8) (9) for taking action against employers for failing to comply with court orders, benefits were allowed to employees even to the High Court. And in the proceedings under subsection (8) and (9) of section 25A of the Ordinance, the Labor Court is not entitled to back its decision, the employer objecting to the payment of back benefits to the employee. Could not be retained and according to the court's decision the employer was obliged to return the benefits to the employees divorce advocates from Dina lawyer