Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus PAKISTAN

Federal Public Service Commission Function Rules 1978 R12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Federal Public Service Commission Public Notice 30 197 10 1978; Annexure IV, Recruitment Policy, Para 3 Allocated to a Special Group for Successful Candidates in Competitive Examination Whether or not it depends on Rule 12 of the Federal Public Service Commission (Rules) Rules, 1978, provided only that available vacancies will be filled. The candidates who took high positions in Para 3, recruitment policy, discussed the recruitment policy as well as the question of the allocation of vacant posts with different provinces = Federal Public Service Commission (duties) rolls 1978, when Reading together, there is clear evidence that the candidate did not have the right to insist that it be allocated to a particular group because of its discretion with the government. Use should be made in accordance with the Public Service Commission's recommendations that were appropriate, based on performance. In the interview, the psychological test and the personality traits of the candidate, however, on the condition that such discretion was used with discrimination and discrimination, were examined by the Public Service Commission, examining the candidate. That the candidate was suitable for office work only ?? Psychological test report shows that this candidate was considered a limited person candidate and that the candidate with the very limited promise of the Public Service Commission despite having a relatively high position in competitive examination. Reports are not found suitable for appointment in any other group Was. However, the candidate has the right to be appointed to a particular group law firms from Jalozai lawyer