Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MUHAMMAD HAMEED MUGHAL, FOREST RANGER, REFORESTATION, BAGH

Sections 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 = constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court in matters relating to the conditions and service of public servants And recognizes And despite issuing an interim order directing the government not to amend the relevant rules for the loss of public servants (applicants), the High Court did not publicize the question as to whether the constitutional petition was intact. The objection to the holding of the constitutional petition was not raised before the High Court. The opposition (government) was not present in the admission phase, however, it should have considered itself, whether the constitutional application was affected by the bar contained in section 47 of the interim Constitution bar included in section 47 of the constitution. Was? That no action can be taken in connection with any matter in which the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal was extended, therefore, to enjoy any action related to the service matters under the Constitutional obligation. Advertisement of the first jurisdictional question, the constitutional petition filed by the Government employees regarding the terms were their terms of service, not enforceable and the same was filed for regular hearing on violation of section 47. It was a similar stand in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, which the High Court Dissent was banned to modify the rules set forth. He was responsible for dismissing constitutional petitions filed in the High Court by government employees. patent advocate from Sangote lawyer