Find a Lawyer

MAHBOOBUL HAQUE versus NOOR ZAMAN

CPC commissions Civil Procedure Code Order XXVI (Commission for Examining Witnesses) OXXVI, R 9 Appointment of Commission for Local Inquiry, Appeal for Appointment of Commission at End of Trial, Trial Court to Reject The eligibility authority rejected. It was at its discretion to use the Commission in appropriate cases that the application for appointment of such commission was made at a phased stage, no reason was offered for expressing the deficiency. Feeling that it had already been headed. The plaintiff was too weak, insufficient, and unreliable to support his alleged claim. Under the law, such a confusion was not legitimate because it would amount to prejudice against a party who had already denied the evidence that the commission was to be appointed as a result of the court. The opinion that such an appointment was necessary to enable the court to resolve the dispute was not considered by the applicants for the appointment of the commission by the trial, even on the issue of dispute resolution. The lacuna, therefore, was rightly rejected by refusing to fill or weakening evidence. power of attorney advocate Wah Cantt lawyer