MANZOOR AHMAD versus RENT CONTROLLER
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 and 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), after hearing the evidence of Article 199 landlords, the issue of the proof of the tenants was postponed, but the tenants hearing nonetheless The second postponement date, instead of presenting evidence, was the request for a further hearing of the filed case on the basis that one of the tenants was acting on behalf of the rent controller, in the tenants' request Not found well, rejected and after the evidence of the tenants closed, The removal order was approved by the controller, the tenants challenged the lower court's orders in the constitutional petition that they were not provided with the proper opportunity to present evidence and the rental controller avoided delays and no one else. He had refused to close his evidence in order to avoid controversy and said he had no objection. If the constitutional application filed by the tenants was accepted and the TRA was allowed to present evidence before the landlord's offer, due to the landlord being fair and equitable, Accepted and after compiling the court orders below, giving the tenants an opportunity to present evidence, the case was remanded for a new decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Chak 46 lawyer