Find a Lawyer

ILYAS MARINE AND ASSOCIATES LTD. versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.

Electricity Act 1910 Sections 24 and 25 Electricity load reduction Plaintiffs have not requested such reduction by the authorities for two years. The Plaintiffs, who approved a load of 150kW, decided to close their factory and Authorities requested reduction. It took authorities almost two years to reduce the power load from 150kW to 50kW with immediate effect, and in the meantime demanded that the plaintiff be billed, presenting his report after the inquiry. Fixed charges billing is unreasonable and advised authorities not to ban the matter. Whatever money was paid by the plaintiffs, the billed charges and the refund to the plaintiffs, the authorities did not appeal within time and the verdict was finalized, however, the appeal was made after the limitation period. Electric inspector receives remand for fresh verdict. Delays in meeting the requirements were for the plaintiff and, with the specified charges, the electric inspector was not justified in obtaining the bills to the plaintiff with fixed charges after the billing plaintiff's decision, thus, not only the bead but the non Legal authorities could not justify the delay of two years in reducing the power load. According to the demands of the plaintiffs, the complaint was decided by the electric inspector but due to the absence of appeal by the defendant within the legal period. It was finalized, officials' long delayed appeal was clearly banned And the appellate forum was not suitable for time restriction appeals. After the due date, he was not entitled to receive fixed charges and the smell of electricity list of supreme court advocates from Mastoi lawyer