Find a Lawyer

ISRAR ALI CHISTI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 212 (3) Public Promotion Employer (Applicant) had not taken any action before the Service Tribunal to challenge the statement of fact charged by the Government in which the service was assigned by the Tribunal. No error or legal error was found for the reasons given. Rejecting the government employee's appeal, the public servant himself selected a specific position and refused to accept promotion to the department for 14 months, and in such cases the next junior was to be promoted on a seniority basis. And since the other employees were senior, they were promoted before the claim of the public servant (s) of the public servant (applicant) for promotion on cadre basis in the cadre, thus the department rightly rejected it. And there can be no exception to the tribunal in excluding the appeal of their services. The application for an appeal against the development of other employees was dismissed in these circumstances, however, the public servant (applicant) could find that he would return to his original cadre and then proceed with the rules as per his rules. Raises questions on sanity online advocate from Peshawar lawyer