Find a Lawyer

FAZAL DIN versus UMAR BIBI

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary injection and interlocutory injunctions OXXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 and Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 54 temporary injunction restraining jurisdiction, exercising suit land that was prohibited, ? Applicant and defendant and defendant have sold their share to someone else, and Wendy acknowledged the possession and construction of the land by the defendant, with the applicant owning more and more land from her share. Wendy had temporarily filed a restraining order on the defendant. Built on it, without the joint holding of the joint holding without the joint holding of the joint venture, he should have claimed the distribution of the joint property, but he did not request the distributor to sell half of the share through the selling partner. Could not sell to applicant even after. Any objection to the use of the property by the vendor respondent to the extent that the shares are held, in view of the fact that the seller's respondent was entitled to retain his possession as long as the partner with the joint property and as long as the joint holding The division is not a court, in which case the applicant was temporarily refused the order. The jurisdiction of the High Court should not be interfered with as the exercise of jurisdiction and discretion in preventing the relief of the applicant was not a hypothetical and arbitrary one. tax advocates from Kallat lawyer