PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF & CO.
Arbitration Act 1940 Sections 8 and 20 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), accepted by the arbitrator by the respondent, the contractor, retaining the court revision award of Rs 60,000 given by the arbitrator appointed by section 115 court. Was filed, but it was objected to by the petitioning department, failing to prove that the arbitrator had committed misconduct or proceedings, by the court pursuant to sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act 1940 Allowed the petitioner's application filed under and the objection raised by the department on appeal by the department against the decision of the case Overturned The court, the appellate court, returned the notice of appeal filed in the court of competent jurisdiction, namely, the High Court in view of the fact that the appellate court's jurisdiction at the relevant time was up to Rs. 50,000 while in this case The amount involved was Rs 60,000. The filing of the appeal before the High Court under the appellate challenged order by the appellate court was extended before the High Court, after the appellate court in review, but the relevant court's jurisdiction, at the relevant time. Was set and should not be later. It was requested that the revision be converted to appeal and the case be remanded for its decision on the merit even if the department will allow the appeal to be amended as requested, but It will be deemed that it has now been filed and will not be effective from now on. When it was prioritized as a request for review, due to time constraints, it was the obligation to reject it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
