MAQBOOLUR RAHMAN versus SHAMSUL QAMAR
Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (c), 15 (2) (ii) and 18 by including oral and documentary evidence of the relationship with the landlord and the tenant landlord, it was fully proved that the dispute Who was his mother after the death of the original allotment of the premises, the premises were regularly exchanged and he received legal rights in the premises after paying the full price, after gaining legal rights in the premises , The transferor / landlord acted on the tenant legal notice, but the tenant failed to receive such notice, the landlord rented Pay the rent to, denying the existence of a relationship between the landlord and the tenant and the landlord, alleging that his (tenant) was permanently given a residential home by the relevant administration. That is, whatever happened after receiving the evidence. According to the legal notice, the tenant had failed to pay the rent to the landlord, not only because of this, but also because he had refused, the payment of the rent was found to be inadmissible. The landlord and tenant relationship that existed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer