Find a Lawyer

SABIR SHAH versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Article B ()) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Election Commission Jurisdictional Competition Interim Order. The final order / decision will be approved by the Election Commission, due to the interim order, the applicant's complaint, if any, will be submitted. Their appeal against the final order / decision before the Supreme Court may be aggravated by the Election Commission; in the case pending before the Election Commission, the decision should always be made in a stable form rather than fragmented. Avoid multiplication. The High Court Election Commission is not entitled to interfere with any of the applicant's interim orders, however, no compensation has been presented (because of the order in question) as to the final decision if they If anyone can complain before the Supreme Court, the Election Commission's interim order (refusal to summon witnesses) cannot be challenged in the Constitution to show the jurisdiction of the High Court applicant before the constitutional jurisdiction. Needed that there was no other suitable and effective treatment for them, if in fact they could When the final decree was passed, there was in fact an alternative and effective remedy before the Supreme Court. In the presence of the petitioner and his lawyer, he has not yet raised this objection to the Election Commission, which was being raised in the constitutional jurisdiction. There was no illegal pinpoint which identified the flaws in the jurisdiction. The constitutional request was not qualified to some extent. property advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer