ATTOCK REFINERY LIMITED, RAWALPINDI versus LAL KHAN
Provisions 1 (3) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and the 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O12 (3) grievance petition hold that the employer's ability Not implemented. According to the provisions of Section 1 (3) (g) of the Ordinance, any person employed as a member of the watch and ward, security or fire service staff at the oil refinery, who is employed as a watchman in the oil refinery, Was unable to request it. The provisions of Section 25A regarding the employer's ordinance were revoked in view of the fact that there was no doubt that the oil refinery care and ward staff for the formation of trade unions and the relations between employers and laborers. No doubt, but Section O12 (3) of the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968, contains the provisions of Section 25A of the Ordinance, 1969, to enable an employee to be protected from his unlawful termination. The service or dismissal, recovery, departure or dismissal was challenged by the employer (s) in his complaint request, he was also eligible.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
