MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ABDUL GHANI
Section 10 of the Homeless (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, and the schedule of the transfer of a room to the roof of a building The entire roof of the building was moved on the respondent even though it was unlawfully covering the entire ground floor ceiling. Has been using. Since 1951, such reasoning for the entire roof allotment of the building would not have been sufficient to warrant the transfer. The Settlement Authority is seeking, without any record, the fact that under the one-room (allotted to the defendant) and vacant rules, the roof of the entire building is forming a unit; The roof of could not be moved. The original PTD by them did not include the roof of the building or the fact that the respondents paid the price, resulting in PTD's subsequent modification to the roof, here Unless the law was guaranteed without receiving a price, the respondents were not entitled to it. Move the roof of the entire building
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Chak 46 lawyer