Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus ZAFAR ALI SHAH


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 204 and 185 ()) The application for contempt of court proceedings against the defendant for violating the terms of the Supreme Court order was accepted in the absence of the respondent and till then That it was not performed correctly. He could not be given any information on the issuance of the injunction. The affidavit on behalf of the petitioner did not disclose that he owned the certified copy of the Supreme Court order and, on the contrary, showed the same to the defendant. , The record shows that no certified copy was obtained by the applicant at that time, the applicant also acknowledged that the certified copy of the pending order was obtained, subsequently insulting to the respondents. There was no basis for court proceedings.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Fateh Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.