ATTA MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), 0XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 suits the sale of the claimant's right to protect his possession The provisional provisional contract for performance was written in the year 1967 and the date for the sale was finalized 1 5 1968, but no action was taken by the claimant on the sale of the seller's life. In the stipulated period, by virtue of Article 113, the Lamination Act, 1908, the required seller to complete the sale, the alleged seller died in 1988, when The house, under discussion, was sold by his successors in interest on 259 1990 and on the basis of an alleged deal in the existing suit. The seller was filed on 1967, September 30, 1990, with no explanation for the claim being delayed after the expiry of two decades, the other co-owners of the property in question, signed an agreement to sell. There were no deliberations under which the timeframe for the completion of the sale on the due date could raise a serious question about the limitation period for filing a suit on specific performance. The fact of the agreement is a serious consideration for the trial. However, the stereotypes raised in the defense were not without substance and neither was the landlord's right to be accepted in the defense case, though there was a dispute among the parties over the nature of the dispute to the extent that the plaintiff disposed of his possession. Will go In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Islamabad lawyer