Article photocopy of the 76 document is permissible by proof of secondary proof, such secondary evidence may be allowed only if there is evidence of actual damage or if it is shown in the possession of someone who is Not subject to action. The court where the person who had the original document submitted should have given a very vague statement that is insufficient to prove the original document's loss, the court should have insisted before allowing the secondary evidence An attempt should be made to detect. Before submitting the original document and the same, especially when the opposing party had refused to implement the said document, some positive evidence should have been presented to the party before the secondary evidence could be presented.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
