Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMA versus SABIR ALI BHOJANI

Sections 16 (1) (2), 1 (a) and 2 (i) Strike on defense over non-payment of fixture charges The landlord filed a petition to stop the tenant's defense on this basis. The tenant was unable to collect the rent and get the services. Regardless of the documentary record kept by the tenant in connection with the fixing charges, rent payment, advance rent and security deposit as per the rental controller's rental order, the tenant Was defended because the tenant had failed to obtain services. According to the agreement between the parties, the fixture compensation was not disclosed in relation to the payment of the rental costs between the parties as per the agreement between the parties from which date the rent will be paid? Of fixtures which showed that the fixtures had already been in dispute before the implementation of the agreement between the parties, as stated in sect. Ion 2 (a) of the ordinance, was a building or part thereof in which all Fittings and fixtures were included, if any, which means that the fittings and fixtures go to the tenant with the leased building, no payment is made, charges cannot be considered as rent. And the tenant who invades the tenant's defense through the controller shall not invoke the terms of section 16 (2) of the Ordinance, irrespective of the payment already made by the tenant and to both parties. Regardless of the version, the order approved by the rental controller could not be retained. Of law online advocate from Musakhel lawyer