Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR KHAN versus FAHIMUDDIN

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) Owing to a personal malpractice requirement, the landlord claimed that he was living in a rented premises, and so was entitled. Moving to his home Landlord further claimed that his wife was generally ill and could not afford to use the fourth floor and her condition was worsening day by day, according to evidence in her affidavit. It is said that his wife was suffering from hypertension and blood pressure, but nothing was available on the record to suggest that the landlord had a wife, not even about his illness. The wife's name was not disclosed, and she did not appear before the court to acknowledge her needs until a copy of the national identity card copy of the wife was presented. Was living in the premises, was not taken into account in his dismissal nor was he included in the claim clause, regarding his wife's illness, the landlord even in the circumstances of his wife's landlord Failed to establish existence, failed to establish the basis of his wife's personal need and therefore deserved to be deprived on that basis. was not. advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer