Find a Lawyer

HATIM ALI SHEIKH versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 5 365 Evidence In this case the preparation of the memo of the arrest and identification of the accused was not only suspicious, nor was the aggression of the police involved in the case taken into consideration nor was the accused's motive. An identity parade was held to identify. , Through the complainant who paid the ransom to the accused, nor was the kidnapping by the abducted wife of the abductor in whose presence he was also declared as a witness in the challan. Although his statement was filed under Section 161, more than eight months after the CCP kidnapper was released, police have examined him in his statement to the police that the abductor had provided no description of the culprits and The details are not stated after which the accused was identified in the court as inappropriate so that the complainant paid the ransom to one of them. The culprits were suspected that the advisory was prepared on the identification of the accused, which is not certified by respected residents of the area. Section 103 was violated, CC investigating officers misrepresented themselves extensively during the investigation and their testimony could not be relied upon even after the Board was not discharged and disconnected. That the Presiding Officer did not conduct the trial responsibly and proceeded. In a slip way, the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside in the circumstances and the case was remanded to the trial court with fresh instructions. advocate from Gambet lawyer