Find a Lawyer

SHAHIDA RAFT versus MUHAMMAD KAMAL

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) The petition filed against the tenant for the loss of premises in dispute by the first landlord regarding the personal need of the landlord was dismissed because the landlord The landlord was unsuccessful in setting up eviction grounds. In a dispute with the original owner, the landlord acknowledged that three different shops were leased to different tenants at different times. The landlord had twice raised the rent of the son's premises for which the landlord had tried to evacuate in a dispute, which was not submitted to cross inspection and as needed. In the payment of rent by the tenant the premises were not confirmed for the son by the mere proof of the landlord's ground, although the landlord requested the eviction, but was not pressured, so the landlord Disappointment of my will, convenience, desire or liking of the landlord will not be enough to show that he needs the premises in good faith, in this case if the belief, not proven, the rent controller rightly so. His dismissal request was dismissed top advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer